<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 24 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78809</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the imported goods should be classified under Chapter 38 of the Eight-digit Tariff Schedule as &quot;RBD Palm Stearin&quot; under Tariff Item No. 3823 11 12. The Court overturned the decision of the CESTAT, reinstating the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s classification. The appeals were granted, and each party was ordered to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 11:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 24 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78809</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the imported goods should be classified under Chapter 38 of the Eight-digit Tariff Schedule as &quot;RBD Palm Stearin&quot; under Tariff Item No. 3823 11 12. The Court overturned the decision of the CESTAT, reinstating the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s classification. The appeals were granted, and each party was ordered to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>