<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 530 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78807</link>
    <description>Procedural contraventions in customs house agent licensing were treated as less than grave misconduct, and the modified punishment was found proportionate to the violations. The Tribunal had concurrently upheld the charges but accepted that the respondents had already been out of business for a substantial period, so limited restoration of the licence was sufficient to meet the ends of justice. The appellate authority was therefore not shown to have exceeded its power in modifying the revocation order, and no substantial question of law arose for interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 15:27:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 530 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78807</link>
      <description>Procedural contraventions in customs house agent licensing were treated as less than grave misconduct, and the modified punishment was found proportionate to the violations. The Tribunal had concurrently upheld the charges but accepted that the respondents had already been out of business for a substantial period, so limited restoration of the licence was sufficient to meet the ends of justice. The appellate authority was therefore not shown to have exceeded its power in modifying the revocation order, and no substantial question of law arose for interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>