<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 568 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78801</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal reviewed a case concerning a Service Tax demand on the manufacture and supply of hologram labels, classifying the activity under &#039;photography service&#039; due to laser photography involvement. However, noting crucial aspects overlooked, the Tribunal remanded the matter for further examination, waiving the pre-deposit requirement and allowing a stay application. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a fresh decision by the Commissioner, considering the absence of laser device usage in the Appellants&#039; activities and implications of excise duty payment by another party involved in hologram label production.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 18:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 568 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78801</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal reviewed a case concerning a Service Tax demand on the manufacture and supply of hologram labels, classifying the activity under &#039;photography service&#039; due to laser photography involvement. However, noting crucial aspects overlooked, the Tribunal remanded the matter for further examination, waiving the pre-deposit requirement and allowing a stay application. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a fresh decision by the Commissioner, considering the absence of laser device usage in the Appellants&#039; activities and implications of excise duty payment by another party involved in hologram label production.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>