https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78796 The High Court held that the writ petition under Article 226 to quash a demand notice was not maintainable as the petitioner did not seek interim relief before the appellate authority during the appeal process. The court emphasized the need to exhaust all available remedies before approaching the court. The court directed the appellate authority to decide the appeal within two months to ensure timely resolution and prevent prolonged delays in the adjudication process. en-us Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78796 The High Court held that the writ petition under Article 226 to quash a demand notice was not maintainable as the petitioner did not seek interim relief before the appellate authority during the appeal process. The court emphasized the need to exhaust all available remedies before approaching the court. The court directed the appellate authority to decide the appeal within two months to ensure timely resolution and prevent prolonged delays in the adjudication process. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78796