https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78790 The Tribunal's import appeal order was unsustainable because it gave no meaningful reasons, did not engage with the rival submissions, the nature of the goods, or the relevant policy provisions, and failed to consider the earlier contrary view placed before it. That absence of a speaking order showed lack of application of mind and did not meet the requirements of natural justice. The Bombay High Court set aside the order and remanded the matter to the Tribunal for fresh consideration on merits by a reasoned decision. en-us Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:30:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78790 The Tribunal's import appeal order was unsustainable because it gave no meaningful reasons, did not engage with the rival submissions, the nature of the goods, or the relevant policy provisions, and failed to consider the earlier contrary view placed before it. That absence of a speaking order showed lack of application of mind and did not meet the requirements of natural justice. The Bombay High Court set aside the order and remanded the matter to the Tribunal for fresh consideration on merits by a reasoned decision. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78790