<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 293 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78787</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the penalty cannot be imposed as they had already paid the service tax and interest before the show-cause notice. The decision was based on the Finance Act, 1994 and a CBEC Circular. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 293 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78787</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the penalty cannot be imposed as they had already paid the service tax and interest before the show-cause notice. The decision was based on the Finance Act, 1994 and a CBEC Circular. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>