<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 91 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78779</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving the treatment of license fees as business income or income from other sources for the assessment year 1989-90. The Tribunal allowed the license fees to be considered business income, permitting depreciation on the sugar unit and set off of brought forward business losses. Despite the lack of a direct nexus to business income, the Tribunal also allowed sugar unit expenses claimed by the assessee. The decision was influenced by the precedent set in CIT Vs. Vikram Cotton Mills, resulting in a favorable outcome for the assessee on all issues raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 91 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78779</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving the treatment of license fees as business income or income from other sources for the assessment year 1989-90. The Tribunal allowed the license fees to be considered business income, permitting depreciation on the sugar unit and set off of brought forward business losses. Despite the lack of a direct nexus to business income, the Tribunal also allowed sugar unit expenses claimed by the assessee. The decision was influenced by the precedent set in CIT Vs. Vikram Cotton Mills, resulting in a favorable outcome for the assessee on all issues raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>