<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 631 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78777</link>
    <description>An appeal against acquittal could not be examined on merits where the trial court record had been weeded out, repeated efforts to reconstruct it failed, and no case papers were traceable. In these circumstances, the appellate court could not meaningfully review the evidence or findings below. A retrial was also refused because more than 30 years had elapsed, making further proceedings impracticable and unfair. The acquittal was therefore left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 631 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78777</link>
      <description>An appeal against acquittal could not be examined on merits where the trial court record had been weeded out, repeated efforts to reconstruct it failed, and no case papers were traceable. In these circumstances, the appellate court could not meaningfully review the evidence or findings below. A retrial was also refused because more than 30 years had elapsed, making further proceedings impracticable and unfair. The acquittal was therefore left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>