https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78776 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a Central Excise Duty recovery notice issued to Ayurvedic medicine manufacturers. Despite unsuccessful attempts to retrieve data from floppies due to potential data loss over time, the Court declined to order data retrieval, noting the availability of hard copies with the respondents. Emphasizing the petition's lengthy pendency and lack of jurisdictional flaw in the notice, the Court directed the petitioners to respond within a month. While dismissing the petition, the Court advised obtaining hard copies of seized software data to prevent future retrieval issues, highlighting the importance of safeguarding electronic evidence. en-us Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:42:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78776 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a Central Excise Duty recovery notice issued to Ayurvedic medicine manufacturers. Despite unsuccessful attempts to retrieve data from floppies due to potential data loss over time, the Court declined to order data retrieval, noting the availability of hard copies with the respondents. Emphasizing the petition's lengthy pendency and lack of jurisdictional flaw in the notice, the Court directed the petitioners to respond within a month. While dismissing the petition, the Court advised obtaining hard copies of seized software data to prevent future retrieval issues, highlighting the importance of safeguarding electronic evidence. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78776