<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 628 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78774</link>
    <description>Deemed Modvat credit under Notification No. 58/97-C.E. remained available to the recipient where the supplier operated under the compounded levy scheme and had discharged duty under Rule 96ZP(3). Any allegation of short levy at the supplier&#039;s end had to be pursued only by the officers having jurisdiction over the supplier, because the recipient&#039;s officers could not re-examine the correctness of the supplier&#039;s duty liability for each clearance. The notification granted deemed credit by design, so the recipient was entitled to the benefit and the department&#039;s objection failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:40:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 628 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78774</link>
      <description>Deemed Modvat credit under Notification No. 58/97-C.E. remained available to the recipient where the supplier operated under the compounded levy scheme and had discharged duty under Rule 96ZP(3). Any allegation of short levy at the supplier&#039;s end had to be pursued only by the officers having jurisdiction over the supplier, because the recipient&#039;s officers could not re-examine the correctness of the supplier&#039;s duty liability for each clearance. The notification granted deemed credit by design, so the recipient was entitled to the benefit and the department&#039;s objection failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>