<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 242 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78773</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal through remand, setting aside the denial of credit and penalty imposition. The matter was remanded to the original authority for reconsideration, with appellants directed to submit evidence within 45 days. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of presenting all relevant evidence for a fair resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 15:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 242 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78773</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal through remand, setting aside the denial of credit and penalty imposition. The matter was remanded to the original authority for reconsideration, with appellants directed to submit evidence within 45 days. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of presenting all relevant evidence for a fair resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>