https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78762 The Tribunal upheld duty liability on the appellant for goods purchased, subject to re-quantification with depreciation benefits. The confiscation of machineries was set aside due to improper notice to the owner, and the penalty imposed under Section 112(b) was also overturned as the appellant lacked knowledge of the goods' liability for confiscation. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant with the aforementioned adjustments. en-us Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:38:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78762 The Tribunal upheld duty liability on the appellant for goods purchased, subject to re-quantification with depreciation benefits. The confiscation of machineries was set aside due to improper notice to the owner, and the penalty imposed under Section 112(b) was also overturned as the appellant lacked knowledge of the goods' liability for confiscation. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant with the aforementioned adjustments. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78762