<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 564 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78758</link>
    <description>Coercive recovery action was held improper while the stay request remained pending before the Tribunal and had already been heard. The Department was expected to await the Tribunal&#039;s order instead of initiating coercive steps during pendency. The application was allowed, and the respondent was directed not to take coercive action against the assessee until the Tribunal passed its order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:36:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 564 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78758</link>
      <description>Coercive recovery action was held improper while the stay request remained pending before the Tribunal and had already been heard. The Department was expected to await the Tribunal&#039;s order instead of initiating coercive steps during pendency. The application was allowed, and the respondent was directed not to take coercive action against the assessee until the Tribunal passed its order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>