<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 119 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78741</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on the challenges raised by the assessee, confirming additions made by the Assessing Officer regarding undisclosed income deposits, alleged gifts, and cash deposits. The court found no substantial questions of law warranting interference, stating that the Tribunal&#039;s findings were based on the evidence on record without any illegality or perversity. The appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 119 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78741</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on the challenges raised by the assessee, confirming additions made by the Assessing Officer regarding undisclosed income deposits, alleged gifts, and cash deposits. The court found no substantial questions of law warranting interference, stating that the Tribunal&#039;s findings were based on the evidence on record without any illegality or perversity. The appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>