<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 613 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78733</link>
    <description>A temporary change in exemption wording did not alter the assessee&#039;s status for the intervening year where the surrounding notification scheme showed a consistent policy. The Tribunal noted that earlier and later notifications treated composite mill eligibility consistently, and the interim omission of the spinning-of-yarn requirement was not enough to deny the benefit for 2000-01. On that basis, the assessee was not regarded as a composite mill during the disputed period, and the credit demand was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:38:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 613 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78733</link>
      <description>A temporary change in exemption wording did not alter the assessee&#039;s status for the intervening year where the surrounding notification scheme showed a consistent policy. The Tribunal noted that earlier and later notifications treated composite mill eligibility consistently, and the interim omission of the spinning-of-yarn requirement was not enough to deny the benefit for 2000-01. On that basis, the assessee was not regarded as a composite mill during the disputed period, and the credit demand was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>