<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 81 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78727</link>
    <description>The HC affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, holding that documentary evidence established that the assessee purchased and sold listed-company shares at prevailing market rates and that the companies confirmed delivery. Although some transactions were off-market, the declared purchase and sale prices conformed to market rates and did not indicate sham dealings or undisclosed income. The court found no basis to treat the transactions as introducings of unaccounted money and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s conclusions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 81 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78727</link>
      <description>The HC affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, holding that documentary evidence established that the assessee purchased and sold listed-company shares at prevailing market rates and that the companies confirmed delivery. Although some transactions were off-market, the declared purchase and sale prices conformed to market rates and did not indicate sham dealings or undisclosed income. The court found no basis to treat the transactions as introducings of unaccounted money and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s conclusions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>