<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 275 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78714</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order and providing relief to the appellant. The decision was based on the finding that fabricating structures at the site constitutes manufacturing excisable goods, aligning with the Neo Structo Construction Ltd. ruling and rejecting the Dodsal (P.) Ltd. precedent cited by the Commissioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 16:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 275 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78714</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order and providing relief to the appellant. The decision was based on the finding that fabricating structures at the site constitutes manufacturing excisable goods, aligning with the Neo Structo Construction Ltd. ruling and rejecting the Dodsal (P.) Ltd. precedent cited by the Commissioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>