<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 75 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78710</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found a violation of natural justice principles in the service tax dispute regarding income from software activation. The appellant&#039;s request for adjournment was not properly addressed, leading to inadequate opportunity to present their case. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh decision after ensuring a reasonable opportunity for the appellants to present their arguments effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 75 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78710</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found a violation of natural justice principles in the service tax dispute regarding income from software activation. The appellant&#039;s request for adjournment was not properly addressed, leading to inadequate opportunity to present their case. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh decision after ensuring a reasonable opportunity for the appellants to present their arguments effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>