<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 512 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78695</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the applicant to pre-deposit the entire service tax demand within eight weeks and report compliance by a specified date. Upon compliance, the interest and penalties imposed on the applicant would be stayed for the duration of the appeal. The Tribunal found that the applicant did not dispute the merits of the demands and that section 73(1)(a) had been correctly invoked in the show-cause notice, leading to the decision against the applicant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:27:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116803" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 512 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78695</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the applicant to pre-deposit the entire service tax demand within eight weeks and report compliance by a specified date. Upon compliance, the interest and penalties imposed on the applicant would be stayed for the duration of the appeal. The Tribunal found that the applicant did not dispute the merits of the demands and that section 73(1)(a) had been correctly invoked in the show-cause notice, leading to the decision against the applicant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>