<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 510 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78686</link>
    <description>The revenue&#039;s appeals challenging the Commissioner (Appeals) decision on the Cenvat credit declaration requirement for GTA services under Notification No. 32/2004-ST were dismissed. The Technical Member found that the revenue&#039;s arguments lacked merit based on precedent set by Tribunal decisions, including the need for subsequent filing of declarations as evidenced in previous cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 11:55:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 510 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78686</link>
      <description>The revenue&#039;s appeals challenging the Commissioner (Appeals) decision on the Cenvat credit declaration requirement for GTA services under Notification No. 32/2004-ST were dismissed. The Technical Member found that the revenue&#039;s arguments lacked merit based on precedent set by Tribunal decisions, including the need for subsequent filing of declarations as evidenced in previous cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>