<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 375 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78680</link>
    <description>The High Court of A.P. dismissed a writ petition challenging the orders of appellate authorities regarding an extension of time for presenting an appeal. The court cited lack of merit and the fact that the cause of action and dispute originated in Mumbai. The court upheld the decisions of the appellate authorities and declined to exercise jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in this matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 11:52:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 375 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78680</link>
      <description>The High Court of A.P. dismissed a writ petition challenging the orders of appellate authorities regarding an extension of time for presenting an appeal. The court cited lack of merit and the fact that the cause of action and dispute originated in Mumbai. The court upheld the decisions of the appellate authorities and declined to exercise jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in this matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>