https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78676 The Division Bench dismissed the petition challenging Central Excise orders due to a significant delay of almost 3 years in filing under Article 226. The court found the reasons for delay presented in the amendment application to be insufficient and lacking justification. Emphasizing the importance of addressing delays in legal proceedings, the court dismissed the petition solely on grounds of delay and laches, without considering the case's merits, highlighting the necessity of timely legal actions for the efficiency of justice administration. en-us Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Jul 2013 11:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78676 The Division Bench dismissed the petition challenging Central Excise orders due to a significant delay of almost 3 years in filing under Article 226. The court found the reasons for delay presented in the amendment application to be insufficient and lacking justification. Emphasizing the importance of addressing delays in legal proceedings, the court dismissed the petition solely on grounds of delay and laches, without considering the case's merits, highlighting the necessity of timely legal actions for the efficiency of justice administration. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78676