<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 513 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78673</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case to the Adjudicating Authority for reconsideration. The appellant was given the opportunity to present evidence of actual payments received from customers to determine the correct amount of Service Tax liability, emphasizing the importance of natural justice principles in the process. The appeal was allowed for reconsideration, stressing the need to base Service Tax liability on actual receipts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:13:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 513 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78673</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case to the Adjudicating Authority for reconsideration. The appellant was given the opportunity to present evidence of actual payments received from customers to determine the correct amount of Service Tax liability, emphasizing the importance of natural justice principles in the process. The appeal was allowed for reconsideration, stressing the need to base Service Tax liability on actual receipts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>