https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78670 An appeal by the revenue was found not maintainable because it was filed by an officer who had not been authorised by the Committee of Commissioners. The authorization had been issued in favour of a different officer, so the statutory requirement under section 86(2)(a) of the Finance Act, 1994 was not satisfied. As a result, the appeal was dismissed. en-us Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Apr 2013 16:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78670 An appeal by the revenue was found not maintainable because it was filed by an officer who had not been authorised by the Committee of Commissioners. The authorization had been issued in favour of a different officer, so the statutory requirement under section 86(2)(a) of the Finance Act, 1994 was not satisfied. As a result, the appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78670