<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 508 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78659</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal, as the appellant failed to adequately justify the delay due to health issues. The appeal, stay application, and request for waiving the pre-deposit of penalty were all dismissed. The judgment emphasizes the importance of providing valid reasons for seeking condonation of delay and the need for diligence in pursuing legal proceedings before the Tribunal, highlighting the significance of complying with procedural requirements and deadlines even in challenging circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 508 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78659</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal, as the appellant failed to adequately justify the delay due to health issues. The appeal, stay application, and request for waiving the pre-deposit of penalty were all dismissed. The judgment emphasizes the importance of providing valid reasons for seeking condonation of delay and the need for diligence in pursuing legal proceedings before the Tribunal, highlighting the significance of complying with procedural requirements and deadlines even in challenging circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>