<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 507 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78658</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, granting the benefit of section 80 for the initial period, resulting in the waiver of penalties under sections 76 and 77 exceeding the amount already paid. However, the penalty under section 75A was upheld as section 80 does not extend to penalties imposed under this section.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 507 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78658</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, granting the benefit of section 80 for the initial period, resulting in the waiver of penalties under sections 76 and 77 exceeding the amount already paid. However, the penalty under section 75A was upheld as section 80 does not extend to penalties imposed under this section.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>