<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 115 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78649</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and remanded the case for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need for a proper consideration of all relevant factors and reasons provided by the adjudicating authority. The Court highlighted the significance of addressing discrepancies and ensuring a comprehensive analysis of evidence to determine the presence of clandestine removal and duty evasion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 115 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78649</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and remanded the case for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need for a proper consideration of all relevant factors and reasons provided by the adjudicating authority. The Court highlighted the significance of addressing discrepancies and ensuring a comprehensive analysis of evidence to determine the presence of clandestine removal and duty evasion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>