https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78643 The High Court allowed the Revenue's appeal under Section 35(G) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging the Tribunal's decision to set aside the levy of interest and penalty against the rubber tyre manufacturer. The matter was remanded by the Supreme Court for a fresh decision based on relevant judgments. The High Court held that the Tribunal's decision was unsustainable due to reliance on a disapproved judgment and directed a fresh decision on merits, refraining from addressing issues of limitation and quantification at that stage. The case was remanded back to the Tribunal for further proceedings. en-us Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Dec 2010 22:49:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78643 The High Court allowed the Revenue's appeal under Section 35(G) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging the Tribunal's decision to set aside the levy of interest and penalty against the rubber tyre manufacturer. The matter was remanded by the Supreme Court for a fresh decision based on relevant judgments. The High Court held that the Tribunal's decision was unsustainable due to reliance on a disapproved judgment and directed a fresh decision on merits, refraining from addressing issues of limitation and quantification at that stage. The case was remanded back to the Tribunal for further proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78643