https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78633 A writ petition challenged an Appellate Tribunal's pre-deposit direction under Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, seeking reduction on the basis of the job-work nature of the activity, duty-paid raw materials, and the amendment to Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The High Court did not express any view on the merits of the excise dispute and confined itself to the pre-deposit issue. It directed that the appeal be heard on deposit of 25% of the amount ordered by the Tribunal within one month, and disposed of the petition. en-us Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 05 Dec 2010 16:41:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78633 A writ petition challenged an Appellate Tribunal's pre-deposit direction under Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, seeking reduction on the basis of the job-work nature of the activity, duty-paid raw materials, and the amendment to Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The High Court did not express any view on the merits of the excise dispute and confined itself to the pre-deposit issue. It directed that the appeal be heard on deposit of 25% of the amount ordered by the Tribunal within one month, and disposed of the petition. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78633