<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 105 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78630</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition seeking to quash a letter by the Additional Commissioner, holding that the determination of duty leviability under the Central Excise Act, 1944, falls within the purview of statutory authorities. The Court emphasized the need to follow the established hierarchy of authorities and procedures under the statutory scheme, indicating that disputes should be resolved through prescribed channels rather than writ petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 16:40:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 105 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78630</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition seeking to quash a letter by the Additional Commissioner, holding that the determination of duty leviability under the Central Excise Act, 1944, falls within the purview of statutory authorities. The Court emphasized the need to follow the established hierarchy of authorities and procedures under the statutory scheme, indicating that disputes should be resolved through prescribed channels rather than writ petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>