<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 52 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78620</link>
    <description>The Court held in favor of the revenue, determining that the adjustment made by the Assessing Officer under Section 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act was justified due to the assessee&#039;s admission of the claim&#039;s incorrectness. The Court disagreed with the Tribunal&#039;s view that the adjustment was a unilateral act, emphasizing the significance of accurate claims in assessments under Section 143(1)(a).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 22:43:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 52 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78620</link>
      <description>The Court held in favor of the revenue, determining that the adjustment made by the Assessing Officer under Section 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act was justified due to the assessee&#039;s admission of the claim&#039;s incorrectness. The Court disagreed with the Tribunal&#039;s view that the adjustment was a unilateral act, emphasizing the significance of accurate claims in assessments under Section 143(1)(a).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>