<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 576 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78583</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by Shri J.S. Marwah, setting aside the penalty imposed on him. In the appeal filed by Shri Pradeep Khanna, the duty demand was upheld, but the penalty was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:05:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 576 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78583</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by Shri J.S. Marwah, setting aside the penalty imposed on him. In the appeal filed by Shri Pradeep Khanna, the duty demand was upheld, but the penalty was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>