<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 32 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78578</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition, upholding the constitutionality of Section 65 (90a) and Section 65 (105) (zzzz) of the Finance Act, 1994. It affirmed the legislative competence of the Central Legislature to levy service tax on renting of immovable property and validated the retrospective application of the levy from 1.6.2007.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2014 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 32 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78578</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition, upholding the constitutionality of Section 65 (90a) and Section 65 (105) (zzzz) of the Finance Act, 1994. It affirmed the legislative competence of the Central Legislature to levy service tax on renting of immovable property and validated the retrospective application of the levy from 1.6.2007.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>