<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 523 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78573</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside penalties imposed by the Commissioner of Customs on various entities and individuals involved in overvalued imports and non-clearance of goods, citing lack of evidence to support their involvement in activities rendering goods liable to confiscation under the Customs Act. Appeals were allowed, and penalties ranging from 5,00,000 to 30,00,000 rupees were overturned based on individual analysis, where penalties on certain individuals and a cargo agency were revoked due to insufficient evidence of their direct involvement in the irregularities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:43:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 523 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78573</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside penalties imposed by the Commissioner of Customs on various entities and individuals involved in overvalued imports and non-clearance of goods, citing lack of evidence to support their involvement in activities rendering goods liable to confiscation under the Customs Act. Appeals were allowed, and penalties ranging from 5,00,000 to 30,00,000 rupees were overturned based on individual analysis, where penalties on certain individuals and a cargo agency were revoked due to insufficient evidence of their direct involvement in the irregularities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>