<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 502 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78557</link>
    <description>Stamp duty valuation alone could not establish higher sale consideration or unexplained investment in property; the disclosed consideration was accepted after inquiry and verification of bank records. Section 50C was treated as a deeming provision limited to capital gains computation and not as proof of extra money passing between parties. In the absence of positive evidence of additional consideration, the Tribunal&#039;s deletion of the addition was found free from legal infirmity, and no substantial question of law arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 15:32:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 502 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78557</link>
      <description>Stamp duty valuation alone could not establish higher sale consideration or unexplained investment in property; the disclosed consideration was accepted after inquiry and verification of bank records. Section 50C was treated as a deeming provision limited to capital gains computation and not as proof of extra money passing between parties. In the absence of positive evidence of additional consideration, the Tribunal&#039;s deletion of the addition was found free from legal infirmity, and no substantial question of law arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>