https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78550 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi dismissed Appeal No. E/1043 of 2008 due to a 53-day delay in filing and the Department's failure to file separate appeals against two entities. The Tribunal clarified that the appeal was competent against both entities as per Rule 6A of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. The Registry's objection was deemed untenable, and the appeal was considered unnecessary. Appeal No. E/1043 of 2008 was to be deemed filed against both entities, with any necessary corrections to be made by the Registry. The condonation application was also dismissed. en-us Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78550 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi dismissed Appeal No. E/1043 of 2008 due to a 53-day delay in filing and the Department's failure to file separate appeals against two entities. The Tribunal clarified that the appeal was competent against both entities as per Rule 6A of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. The Registry's objection was deemed untenable, and the appeal was considered unnecessary. Appeal No. E/1043 of 2008 was to be deemed filed against both entities, with any necessary corrections to be made by the Registry. The condonation application was also dismissed. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78550