<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 534 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78545</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the applicants, stating that the Tribunal was not justified in invoking Section 120(2) of the Customs Act for the confiscation of silver without providing proper notice and an opportunity for the applicants to be heard. The court emphasized the importance of natural justice principles, highlighting that the absence of a specific show cause notice invoking Section 120(2) deprived the applicants of a fair chance to present their case. As a result, the court held that the Tribunal&#039;s decision to confiscate the silver under Section 120(2) was invalid. The reference was answered with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:38:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 534 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78545</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the applicants, stating that the Tribunal was not justified in invoking Section 120(2) of the Customs Act for the confiscation of silver without providing proper notice and an opportunity for the applicants to be heard. The court emphasized the importance of natural justice principles, highlighting that the absence of a specific show cause notice invoking Section 120(2) deprived the applicants of a fair chance to present their case. As a result, the court held that the Tribunal&#039;s decision to confiscate the silver under Section 120(2) was invalid. The reference was answered with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>