<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 248 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78533</link>
    <description>The presiding officer set aside the order and remitted the case for a fresh decision to the adjudicating authority. The assessees were directed to produce their books of account to establish that the payments made were reimbursed by their clients. The appeal was allowed by way of remand for further examination and clarification on the reimbursement of payments by clients.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 15:40:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 248 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78533</link>
      <description>The presiding officer set aside the order and remitted the case for a fresh decision to the adjudicating authority. The assessees were directed to produce their books of account to establish that the payments made were reimbursed by their clients. The appeal was allowed by way of remand for further examination and clarification on the reimbursement of payments by clients.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>