<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 562 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78528</link>
    <description>Industrial solvents and naphtha distillates were held not to fall under Heading 2710.13 because classification as special boiling point spirits required both the flash-point condition and actual, practical suitability for use as fuel in spark ignition engines; theoretical or literature-based possibility was insufficient. As the goods were supplied to industries such as paints, rubber, plastics and pharmaceuticals, and there was no evidence of clearance for engine-fuel use, they were classified under Heading 2710.90. On that classification, the exclusion in Notification No. 67/95-C.E. did not apply, so the exemption remained available to naphtha distillates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:36:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 562 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78528</link>
      <description>Industrial solvents and naphtha distillates were held not to fall under Heading 2710.13 because classification as special boiling point spirits required both the flash-point condition and actual, practical suitability for use as fuel in spark ignition engines; theoretical or literature-based possibility was insufficient. As the goods were supplied to industries such as paints, rubber, plastics and pharmaceuticals, and there was no evidence of clearance for engine-fuel use, they were classified under Heading 2710.90. On that classification, the exclusion in Notification No. 67/95-C.E. did not apply, so the exemption remained available to naphtha distillates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>