<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 525 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78518</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner&#039;s imposition of penalties under sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was unwarranted, as the appellants had paid the Service Tax and interest before the show-cause notice was issued based on advice from an association. The Tribunal emphasized that penalties should not be imposed in cases where Service Tax demand is confirmed and the extended period is invoked without evidence of evasion. The appeals were allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 18:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 525 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78518</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner&#039;s imposition of penalties under sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was unwarranted, as the appellants had paid the Service Tax and interest before the show-cause notice was issued based on advice from an association. The Tribunal emphasized that penalties should not be imposed in cases where Service Tax demand is confirmed and the extended period is invoked without evidence of evasion. The appeals were allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>