<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 526 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78511</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and remitting the matter to the Income-tax Officer for fresh assessment based on the observations made in the judgment. The Court emphasized the importance of proving the consistency between the declared assets and the actual sale transactions to determine the tax liability accurately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:37:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 526 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78511</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and remitting the matter to the Income-tax Officer for fresh assessment based on the observations made in the judgment. The Court emphasized the importance of proving the consistency between the declared assets and the actual sale transactions to determine the tax liability accurately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>