<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 521 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78509</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the order for payment of Special Excise Duty, interest, and penalties. It was determined that the mistake in depositing the duty under the wrong code was a bona fide error, not deliberate evasion. The appellants were not required to repay the amount but were instructed to rectify the accounting code for proper record-keeping. The appeal was allowed, and there was no basis for penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 14:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 521 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78509</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the order for payment of Special Excise Duty, interest, and penalties. It was determined that the mistake in depositing the duty under the wrong code was a bona fide error, not deliberate evasion. The appellants were not required to repay the amount but were instructed to rectify the accounting code for proper record-keeping. The appeal was allowed, and there was no basis for penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>