<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 484 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78498</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting a waiver of the pre-deposit of the entire Service Tax amount and penalty. The Tribunal rejected the Departmental Representative&#039;s contention that the mere supply of drawings and designs constituted &quot;Consulting Engineer&quot; activity, emphasizing it was not a matter of service classification. The appellant&#039;s argument that the activity did not meet the criteria for &quot;Consulting Engineer&quot; and the exemption under the CBEC Circular for services provided outside India before 2006 were considered valid, leading to the stay on tax liability during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 484 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78498</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting a waiver of the pre-deposit of the entire Service Tax amount and penalty. The Tribunal rejected the Departmental Representative&#039;s contention that the mere supply of drawings and designs constituted &quot;Consulting Engineer&quot; activity, emphasizing it was not a matter of service classification. The appellant&#039;s argument that the activity did not meet the criteria for &quot;Consulting Engineer&quot; and the exemption under the CBEC Circular for services provided outside India before 2006 were considered valid, leading to the stay on tax liability during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>