<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 473 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78466</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the appellants to deposit Rs. 15,000 within six weeks due to financial hardship. Upon this deposit, the remaining penalty under section 76 was waived, and recovery stayed. The decision balanced legal precedent with the appellant&#039;s financial circumstances, providing a partial waiver of the penalty under section 76 based on the specific facts of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:12:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 473 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78466</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the appellants to deposit Rs. 15,000 within six weeks due to financial hardship. Upon this deposit, the remaining penalty under section 76 was waived, and recovery stayed. The decision balanced legal precedent with the appellant&#039;s financial circumstances, providing a partial waiver of the penalty under section 76 based on the specific facts of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>