<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 475 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78462</link>
    <description>The court upheld the appellate authority&#039;s decision, holding the petitioner liable for a higher total amount, including duty, penalty, and interest, than claimed in the show cause notice. The court deemed the attachment notice for non-payment of dues valid, as the petitioner&#039;s liabilities were accurately determined. The court dismissed the petition, finding no grounds to challenge the attachment order in the writ jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:05:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 475 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78462</link>
      <description>The court upheld the appellate authority&#039;s decision, holding the petitioner liable for a higher total amount, including duty, penalty, and interest, than claimed in the show cause notice. The court deemed the attachment notice for non-payment of dues valid, as the petitioner&#039;s liabilities were accurately determined. The court dismissed the petition, finding no grounds to challenge the attachment order in the writ jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>