https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78436 The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner in a case challenging the imposition of cess by the Cess Committee Appellate Tribunal, considering them a manufacturer. The Court held that the petitioner, engaged in job work of bleaching and dyeing textiles from the Power Loom Industry, is entitled to benefits under Section 5A proviso. Emphasizing the origin of the products from the Power Loom and Handloom Industry, the Court set aside the impugned order imposing cess, granting relief to the petitioner. en-us Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:33:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78436 The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner in a case challenging the imposition of cess by the Cess Committee Appellate Tribunal, considering them a manufacturer. The Court held that the petitioner, engaged in job work of bleaching and dyeing textiles from the Power Loom Industry, is entitled to benefits under Section 5A proviso. Emphasizing the origin of the products from the Power Loom and Handloom Industry, the Court set aside the impugned order imposing cess, granting relief to the petitioner. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78436