<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 742 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78430</link>
    <description>The High Court of Karnataka allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue, setting aside the orders of the appellate authorities and restoring the Assessing Officer&#039;s valuation for capital gains tax assessment of a property. The court held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s valuation, considering both sold and unsold flats, was more appropriate than the lower valuation adopted by the assessee. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering all relevant factors and legal documents in determining property valuation for tax assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:40:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 742 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78430</link>
      <description>The High Court of Karnataka allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue, setting aside the orders of the appellate authorities and restoring the Assessing Officer&#039;s valuation for capital gains tax assessment of a property. The court held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s valuation, considering both sold and unsold flats, was more appropriate than the lower valuation adopted by the assessee. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering all relevant factors and legal documents in determining property valuation for tax assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>