<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 491 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78418</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai upheld the decision to set aside a penalty of Rs. 60,000 imposed on importers for importing spoiled &#039;Yoghurt&#039; from Spain. The Tribunal ruled that the importers were not at fault as the spoilage occurred due to sea water entry during the voyage, and they had borne the cost of destroying the consignment. The appeal by the Revenue was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 15:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 491 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78418</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai upheld the decision to set aside a penalty of Rs. 60,000 imposed on importers for importing spoiled &#039;Yoghurt&#039; from Spain. The Tribunal ruled that the importers were not at fault as the spoilage occurred due to sea water entry during the voyage, and they had borne the cost of destroying the consignment. The appeal by the Revenue was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>