https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78415 The appeal was partly allowed with the demand dropped by the Commissioner. However, liability for interest and penalty under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 was upheld, with a reduced penalty amount of Rs. 5,000 imposed. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of obtaining prior permission for the movement of goods to a sister unit for storage, as per Rule 8 of the CENVAT Rules 2004. en-us Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:42:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78415 The appeal was partly allowed with the demand dropped by the Commissioner. However, liability for interest and penalty under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 was upheld, with a reduced penalty amount of Rs. 5,000 imposed. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of obtaining prior permission for the movement of goods to a sister unit for storage, as per Rule 8 of the CENVAT Rules 2004. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78415