<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 486 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78411</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal regarding the eligibility of Cenvat credit for imported generators, upholding the respondent&#039;s claim for 50% duty credit. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was influenced by a similar case in the High Court of Gujarat, unaware of the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling on the matter. The Department later sought rectification of the Tribunal&#039;s decision, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment. The Tribunal granted the Department&#039;s application for condonation of delay, emphasizing adherence to statutory limitations while allowing rectification based on sufficient cause, illustrating the importance of procedural compliance and equitable considerations in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:40:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 486 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78411</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal regarding the eligibility of Cenvat credit for imported generators, upholding the respondent&#039;s claim for 50% duty credit. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was influenced by a similar case in the High Court of Gujarat, unaware of the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling on the matter. The Department later sought rectification of the Tribunal&#039;s decision, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment. The Tribunal granted the Department&#039;s application for condonation of delay, emphasizing adherence to statutory limitations while allowing rectification based on sufficient cause, illustrating the importance of procedural compliance and equitable considerations in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>